*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://satet.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers
The Writing.Com members below are accepting review requests and ready to review your item! Peruse the list, check out members' review styles and request a review from anyone who seems like a good fit for your item.
Preferred Author
Leif the Lucky
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I'm a tough grader, but I don't neglect good things when I see them. I'll be considering two things when I review your piece. 1) Form. How is the pacing? Are you going for a conventional story structure, and if so, is that structure in place? Did the story resolve itself in a satisfying way, or is it an anticlimax? I generally don't go into spelling/grammar unless it's a major issue. 2) Content. This is where it gets tricky and subjective. Sometimes I'll give an objectively bad piece a good rating because it captured the spirit of something I'm interested in – or maybe it grabbed me in another way. If your story is beautifully written but low-stakes, trivial, or out of touch (I'm one of those jazz cigarette-crazed millennials you've heard so much about) the best you're getting is a 4.0.
aundria_k's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Angels in my Ear
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
I enjoy reviewing and try to be as honest as possible. I look for specific things such as technical merit, flow and lyrical quality in poems, creativity, tone, and mood. Though I can be a tough critic, I strive to encourage writers to grow and challenge themselves. I feel that it is through constructive criticism that we grow as writers. I strive to give the writer feedback on the overall impact of the piece. I am the host and judge of the "Shadows and Light Poetry Contest and co-host of the "Roots & Wings Contest
Registered Author
lotte
(minimum 25,000 GPs)
I break down plot, character, style, and grammar. I'll tell you everything that didn't work by listing them as bullet-points.
Preferred Author
tracker
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
Overall impression, likes, suggestions, positive closing. I am honored to do reviews upon request, usually on the first day 2023 Quill Winner
Preferred Author
Odessa Molinari
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to say how I relate to an item. Spelling and grammar are less important.
sodette's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Shawn Odette
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I give constructive criticism of your work. I will be very honest but polite. When I read a story I ask myself if this is something I would pay to read in a magazine or an online venue. If it is, I will tell you why, if not I will tell you why it's not. Please do not send me rough drafts. If it is not a finished copy, then I don't want to see it because the errors tend to be too distracting from the actual story.
kingalex1234's Portfolio!
Registered Author
kingalex1234
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I tend to be constructive, though I've been known to be a bit too nice...at least, in my opinion. note that while I'll review anything requested, they can be a bit sloppy if I don't take interest.
tvelocity's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
Graham B.
(minimum 2,500 GPs)
Brutally honest, but fair. I will give my impressions of the main points: Plot, character, setting, dialog. Then I will get into grammar, spelling, and typos. I will tell you what works, and what doesn't. As far as the star ratings go, I don't rely on them too much, but use them as a measure of an item's relative merit. Take it for what it's worth. Bottom line, my goal is to help the author improve their work.
Preferred Author
Beholden
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I have a review template that is only used for in depth reviews, usually those that are specifically requested. These will be as comprehensive as I can manage, including everything I have noticed in reading the piece. Most of my reviews, however, are more in the nature of reactions to the piece with brief notes on things I find particularly good and suggestions on dealing with any obvious flaws in the writing.
stfrancisii's Portfolio!
Registered Author
St. Francis II
(minimum 1,500 GPs)
I'll be honest with what I like and do not like about your work.
Registered Author
S.J - Not Around Much
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm honest when I review thing I'll say what's on my mind but at the same time I try to stay positive and will always tell you what you did right but this means in no way am I a professional reviewer so take my reviews with a grin of salt please
notjackson's Portfolio!
Registered Author
jackson
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am not an expert reviewer, but I have some small amount of talent in the field of writing. I will not edit your work, but typos, grammar mistakes, etc. will be pointed out if I see them. I will give you my impression of your work, encourage you, and do my best to review the work.
Registered Author
LorenIsOneOfMyNames
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I'm honest but constructive. I'll explain why I give the number of stars I give and what you could do to improve that. I do fix grammar as well as look at style, emotional triggers, characters, and other things like that. I'll get back to you with a full review in a couple of days or so after the request, depending on the length of the item.
Preferred Author
H❀pe
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
My review style is informal and encouraging of writer's development.
coolzebra's Portfolio!
Registered Author
Dreamsage
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
When I review something, I look for grammar and it's content. I can say what you miss or what you need.
wyrd_naos's Portfolio!
Preferred Author
WyrdNaos Trippin' on Yello
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to be analytical in my reviewing. The most interesting pieces of writing often work on a number of different levels, and so I try to consider multiple perspectives when informing the author of what I liked or disliked about their piece. For this reason, I don't get along very well with templates, as I find they turn the whole process into something very clinical! You can expect my reviews to be a fluid, tailored discussion of your individual work.
Preferred Author
Smee
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to go in depth on how I felt whilst reading it. I'll point out where I was tripped out of my flow by sentence structure or oddity. What confuses me. What intrigues me. Examples can be seen in my recent reviews. Happy to review privately on request. Default will be public.
 
I use "Comment-In-A-Box for my ratings.
Preferred Author
QueenNormaJeanGreeneggs&vegham
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I like to give friendly advice that I hope will help, not harm.
wertyiustudios's Portfolio!
Registered Author
ImaLukewarmPizza
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I do not correct grammar mistakes unless they take away from the story. I make comments about the world and relation to the piece, and point things out for you to ponder upon. I'll talk about my initial reaction to the piece and suggestions based on this. I tell you how you could make your piece resonate more and mean more.
Preferred Author
Just an Ordinary Boo!
(minimum 1,000 GPs)
I am meticulous about trying to give some useful pointers as feedback, if not about writing, at least about what I felt when I read the piece. I will not do line-by-line edits but will give examples of the typos or errors, if seen at all. I prefer not to read explicit details or abusive language although I will review anything asked, personal preference disregarded. My own forte is for writing short stories, observational humour. But if I review what is outside my capacity or comfort zone, I research the norms before commenting. I do not intend to hurt or denigrate, for I respect writing too much to do so. Nor do I feel I review except as fellow word-lover and writing-student. If I forget a commitment, feel free to knock on my door to remind me!
Printed from https://satet.writing.com/main/authors/action/reviewers